23. The representative of India said that his delegation had mentioned enforcement trends during a previous Council meeting, but this had been done under other business, and the objective had been to inform the Council about the TRIPS-plus agenda under a plurilateral agreement signed by a few countries, and how this was going to undermine the TRIPS Agreement. While he was not against discussing enforcement, he said that TRIPS-plus or ACTA was not part of the TRIPS Agreement and should not be a permanent agenda item, and that the suggested title of the proposed item was not appropriate.