Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Lundeg Purevsuren
9 SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL REVIEW UNDER PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE DECISION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 66.2 OF THE TRIPS AGREEMENT

181.   Switzerland was pleased to participate in this year's workshop on Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement and to receive more information on the priority sectors for technology transfer of LDCs. We would like to thank the Secretariat for its organization and for leading the workshop in an efficient and thorough manner. The constructive discussions held throughout the workshop, will certainly contribute to the continued cooperation on technology transfer. 182.   It was particularly useful to be presented with some concrete examples of technology transfer that have worked well in practice. This serves as an orientation for developed countries when developing incentive measures and planning tailor made projects together with LDC partners. 183.   Switzerland is of the view that the presentations made by LDCs during the workshop should not only contain examples of past or current projects. We very much welcome that, several LDCs presented comprehensive project outlines during the workshop. 184.   We would like to mention that the presentation by Myanmar at the Workshop on Article 66.2 last year was very helpful for us to understand what is needed by specific LDCs. In turn, Switzerland was able to respond to Myanmar's request for a bilateral project on IPRs, for which the planning of practical, needs-based activities has been finalized, and implementation has just begun. 185.   Switzerland would like to thank the LDC Group for its document RD/IP/37. We need time to consult with the various competent agencies in capital responsible for issues relating to technology transfer and respective incentive mechanisms. 186.   Switzerland remains committed to engage in the TRIPS Council's discussion on Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement and to further develop the incentive measures for companies and institutions in Switzerland to promote and encourage technology transfer to LDCs.

The Council took note of the statements made.
25.   The Chair recalled that, at its meeting in October 2019, the Council had had on its agenda the 17th Annual Review under Paragraph 2 of the Decision on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement. At that meeting, delegations had briefly presented the updated reports submitted by developed country Members under Article 66.2. Since that meeting New Zealand had submitted its updated report. All updated reports had been circulated under IP/C/W/656 and addenda. At that meeting, the Council had also agreed that it would revert to the item at the present meeting to permit continued consideration of the submitted material.
26.   In order to give LDC Members more time to absorb the information provided by developed countries in their reports, and to ensure that these reports were available in the official languages of the WTO, the Article 66.2 Workshop had once again taken place back-to-back with the TRIPS Council meeting. This had allowed some of the capital-based delegates who had participated in the Workshop, to participate in the meeting and take part in the discussions under this agenda item.
27.   The LDC Group has circulated a Room document entitled, "Proposed New Template of annual Reporting on Technology Transfer to LDCs". This room document RD/IP/37 was available online on documents for meetings, and as a paper copy at the back of the meeting room. He noted that the English and French texts were both contained in the same document. He invited the Secretariat to report on the Workshop.
28.   A representative of the Secretariat took the floor.
29.   The Chair invited delegations to comment on the materials submitted for the last meeting, as well as to share their experiences from the Article 66.2 Workshop held in the past two days.
30.   The representatives of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group; Bangladesh; the United Kingdom; Switzerland; the United States of America; Canada; the European Union; Japan; Norway; Vanuatu; Australia; and the African Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) took the floor.
31.   The Council took note of the statements made.
IP/C/M/94, IP/C/M/94/Add.1