Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Xolelwa Mlumbi-Peter
3 IP MEASURES IN THE CONTEXT OF COVID-19
61.   More than 16.5 million cases and 650 thousand deaths of COVID-19 have been confirmed globally. The global community is facing an extraordinary challenge. No country has been spared the devastating effects of COVID-19. The health and human toll are substantial and expected to continue to grow. 62.   In this context we recall Resolution of the World Health Assembly WHA 73.1 of 19 May 2020, which recognizes that the COVID-19 pandemic has a disproportionately heavy impact on the poor and the most vulnerable, with repercussions on health and development gains, in particular in lowincome countries. It further calls on cooperation between multilateral organizations and other stakeholders and the World Health Organization (WHO) Director General to identify and provide options that respect the provisions of relevant international treaties, including the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement and the flexibilities within the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, to be used in scaling up development, manufacturing and distribution capacities needed for transparent, equitable and timely access to quality, safe, affordable and efficacious diagnostics, therapeutics, medicines, and vaccines for the COVID-19 response. South Africa welcomes the launch of the Trilateral Study on Access to Medical Technologies and Innovation but notes it is very thin on the issues related to COVID-19. 63.   The list of verified measures prepared by the Secretariat already indicate some steps taken by Members and supplemented by views Members will express during this TRIPS Council meeting and further meetings. A further step in concretizing this commitment is to hold a workshop as requested by the ACP Group which will give Members and other participants an opportunity to further discuss IP challenges with respect to access and to explore approaches to deal with COVID-19 in the context of intellectual property rights. 64.   Curbing the pandemic and limiting the social and economic fallout is dependent on an unprecedented timely roll out of sufficient quantities of medical supplies to all countries in need including masks, personal protective equipment, ventilators, diagnostic kits as well as therapeutics and vaccines as they are identified. This requires global solidarity to transfer technology and massively scale-up manufacturing globally. At present there are vast shortages of medical products within a country as well as between developed and developing countries. In light of possible second waves of the coronavirus, countries must take measures to ensure that they are able to restock medical products that will be needed to fight the virus. 65.   The WHO estimates that at least 500 million tests are needed over the next 12 months in low and middle-income countries. Testing if deployed in a timely way could contribute to saving at least nine million lives and avert at least 1.5 billion COVID-19 infections. The challenge with testing is to develop new rapid diagnostic tests and to scale up the production of such reliable, affordable tests to a volume sufficient for all countries to access them. Similar shortages can be seen with respect to personal protective equipment and ventilators. Bloomberg reports that the world demand for ventilators is ten times the current supply capacity. Manufacturing ventilator parts for e.g. using e.g. 3D printing raises a number of intellectual property issues such as patents, industrial design and copyright. 66.   The challenge of intellectual property is most apparent in the area of therapeutics. Several of the therapeutics under investigation do have patents granted or pending in many countries. A recent case that has widely been reported is remdesivir, approved in several jurisdictions as preliminary results showed that it shortened the recovery period. Earlier this month, it was reported that Gilead had agreed to supply the United States its projected production for the next three months, raising concern about supply of remdesivir to other countries. Gilead has entered into nine licensing agreements with generic manufacturers from three countries for the supply to 127 countries. These limited, non-transparent exclusive licenses seem to be an attempt to contain competition by creating an oligopoly. Generic manufacturers globally that can contribute to expanding global supply have been excluded. The lack of transparency, and accountability in the present dire times is extremely worrying and dangerous. It is an indicator of the IP and access challenges ahead of us, that the WTO Members need to address effectively and swiftly. On the subject of vaccines, there are already news reports of intellectual property disputes that could hinder the development and production of COVID19 vaccines. We observe with great apprehension the rush by developed country Members to sign deals to gain preferential access to vaccines, leaving many countries behind. Vaccine nationalism may address short term political demands of a country but drastically falls short of what is required to contain this pandemic. World leaders from the North and South have referred to a vaccine as a global public good, that should be fairly and equitably available globally, leaving no one behind. Now is the time to put it into action. 67.   The challenge before us is to produce an effective vaccine to meet the needs of the world population of 7.8 billion in as short a time frame as possible. This will require the sharing of knowledge and technology of successful vaccines so that the widest distribution at lowest cost can be achieved. Even the European Parliament Resolution entitled "The EU's public health strategy postCOVID-19" which was adopted on 10 July 2020 acknowledges its importance as it calls for "maximum sharing of COVID-19 health technology-related knowledge, intellectual property and data to the benefit of all countries in the context of WHO's Technology Access Pool (C-TAP). It also calls for strong support for the WHO's C-TAP, while incorporating collective safeguards in favour of the public regarding public funding, such as transparency, accessibility and affordability clauses and non-exclusive licences for exploitation of final products, in all current and future calls for funding and investment. It further calls for enhanced dialogue with third countries and the issuance of compulsory licences in the event that such countries do not share their vaccines or therapeutic knowledge. 68.   In a July 2020 paper, MSF documented how exclusive rights and monopolies granted to pharmaceutical corporations, resulting in high prices and blocking generic competition has had a negative effect on MSF's medical actions in different countries. This has affected that ability of countries to provide access to treatment of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, hepatitis C and cancer for patients who need them. Beyond access to pharmaceuticals and biosimilars, the effects of patents have also hindered the introduction of affordable vaccines in developing countries, with the focus on pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) and human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV). The 'fair shot' report found that the patents increase uncertainty, costs and delays in competition resulting in high prices for low-and-middle income countries. We cannot afford a similar scenario when dealing with COVID-19. In short, we are of the view that the World Trade Organization should be cognizant of IP obstacles across essential medical products needed to contain the pandemic and take urgent steps to address these barriers in a comprehensive manner. The WTO TRIPS Agreement does provide a number of flexibilities that may be utilized by Members to overcome IP obstacles. In anticipation of such barriers, some WTO Members have undertaken urgent changes to national patent legislation to make it easier to issue compulsory licenses. However, there are a number of challenges: 69.   Firstly, IP barriers go beyond patents, and often flexibilities in other intellectual property such as industrial designs, copyright and trade secrets is often less understood and implemented nationally. 70.   Secondly, developing countries may face legal, technical and institutional challenges in using TRIPS flexibilities. This is especially true for countries that have never utilized flexibilities such as compulsory licenses. 71.   Thirdly, when an exporting country is producing under a compulsory license mainly for export, the mechanism established by the 30 August 2003 decision, and later translated into an amendment of the TRIPS Agreement as Article 31bis, would be applicable. This mechanism waives the condition in Article 31(f) that a compulsory license should be predominantly for the supply of the domestic market. However, experience in using this mechanism is largely non-existent. In 2006, Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors without Borders) attempted to use the procedures to export HIV medicines from Canada to Rwanda but it concluded that the mechanism is neither expeditious nor workable. We also note that implementation of the Article 31bis mechanism at a national level is rather limited or may not achieve its intended objectives. Further some countries have opted out of using this system as importers, which may pose a challenge to access. 72.   Several voluntary initiatives have emerged since the outbreak of COVID-19 including pledges and voluntary licenses. Some of these are commendable, but these are ad hoc initiatives, simply inadequate to systematically and comprehensively address IP barriers. IP holders of essential technologies may also decide not to participate in such initiatives. 73.   The World Health Organization has launched the COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP) calling IP holders to voluntarily issue global non-exclusive licenses or to voluntarily surrender intellectual property rights, to facilitate the widescale production, distribution, sale and use of such health technologies throughout the world. However, to date no company has committed to doing so. Instead limited, exclusive and often non-transparent voluntary licensing seems to be the preferred approached and these are insufficient to address the needs of the current COVID-19 pandemic. 74.   "Business as usual" approaches are simply inadequate to tackle COVID-19. We need to consider new bold measures that will comprehensively and expeditiously address IP challenges. The following approaches can be considered: 75.   Members must explore international collaborations and binding commitments to facilitate the open sharing and right to use technologies, know-how, data and global non-exclusive rights to use and produce COVID-19 medical products. 76.   Members must take policy and legislative measures to ensure that patents and other intellectual property do not erect barriers to access to medicines, diagnostics, vaccines and medical supplies and devices. This includes addressing evergreening of patents by restricting the grant of secondary patents on known medicines and excluding from patentability second medical uses as being mere methods of treatment in terms of Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement. Members are encouraged to take measures to facilitate the local manufacturing or import of essential medical supplies, devices or technologies including diagnostics, medicines and vaccines.
18.   The Council took note of the statements made.
15.   The Chair said that the item had been put on the agenda at the request of South Africa, referring to the document "COVID-19: Measures Regarding Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights", which was available from the WTO website and contained a non-exhaustive list of IP-related measures taken in the context of COVID-19. The list compiled by the Secretariat from official sources and verified by the Members concerned. It was updated continuously, and the latest version was always available on the WTO website. She invited South Africa to introduce the item.
16.   The representative of South Africa took the floor to introduce the item.
17.   The representatives of Nigeria; Brazil; China; Chile; India; El Salvador; the Russian Federation; Indonesia; Ecuador; the United States of America; the European Union; Australia; and Switzerland took the floor.
18.   The Council took note of the statements made.
IP/C/M/95, IP/C/M/95/Add.1