Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Xolelwa Mlumbi-Peter (South Africa)
15 PROPOSAL FOR A WAIVER FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE TRIPS AGREEMENT FOR THE PREVENTION, CONTAINMENT AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19

1439.   Switzerland supports the status report to the General Council. My delegation would like to thank you, Chair, for the consultations held with the view achieving consensus and we welcome the adoption of the status report by the Council that morning. 1440.   The discussion in the Council so far shows that Members share the same understanding of the extraordinary nature of the crisis that the global community faces due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 1441.   Members are united in the objective to undertake all necessary efforts to work as swiftly as possible towards global and equitable access to medical products to prevent, contain and treat COVID-19. 1442.   Members disagree that suspending large parts of the TRIPS Agreement during the pandemic would help us achieve this objective. Many think that doing so will actually work against this objective. 1443.   Switzerland is of the view that such a step would indeed be counterproductive. It would result in considerable legal uncertainty at the national and international level. It would thus put into question a key component of the basis on which stakeholders currently engage in international initiatives and partnerships to make fast and equitable global access to medical products against COVID-19 a reality. 1444.   We thank South Africa for its communication in document IP/C/W/670. It is based on the assumption that IP will work as a barrier to the access of medical products against the coronavirus. However, the communication presents no convincing evidence that would justify a sweeping suspension of large parts of the TRIPS Agreement, rather than, if necessary in a particular case, making use of a flexibility already built-into the TRIPS Agreement. 1445.   We thank also Australia, Canada, Chile and Mexico for their communication in document IP/C/W/671, in which a number of relevant questions are posed which merit further examination. 1446.   My delegation thus agrees that this Council continue its discussion, so that the proponents and other Members can answer the questions posed and still open from the three past meetings or contained in the communications just referred to. 1447.   Let me conclude by emphasizing that we need to address this challenge together, in a holistic and sustainable manner - and within the rules-based multilateral trading system. 1448.   Yes, our imminent and most urgent common concern is now how to effectively fight the COVID19 pandemic, causing tragic loss in human lives and enormous economic damage to all our countries and to the international community at large. 1449.   International initiatives underway to work for this collectively are key, such as WHO's COVAX, COVAX Advance Market Commitment or Act Accelerator. Accordingly, we call on all Members to engage in these initiatives. 1450.   As WTO Members, it is also our responsibility to think of the long term consequences of our decisions and the impact of our actions on the rules-based multilateral trading system. Were we to suspend large parts of a WTO Agreement during this pandemic that embodies a collective consensus for more than 25 years and of 164 countries: What signal would we send to the outside world on the reasons of existence of the multilateral regulatory framework, on its utility and reliability? In our view, it is essential that solutions to the unprecedented challenges we face be found within that framework - and not by giving up on it. 1451.   COVID-19 will not be the last pandemic, or virus, or pressing health or other serious problem that humanity faces and will have to fight against. We only stand a chance to do so together, in close partnership and solidarity, with all the necessary stakeholders involved and on board, and with the support of a solid, trustworthy, rule-based multilateral system.

The Council so agreed.
84. The Chair said that this item had been put on the agenda at the request of India and South Africa; and a communication had been circulated. She invited India and South Africa to introduce their proposal.
85. The representatives of India and South Africa took the floor.
86. The Chair invited Members to take the floor.
87. The representatives of Kenya; Nigeria; Bangladesh; Sri Lanka; Pakistan; the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela; Nepal; Philippines; Nicaragua; Chile; Turkey; Egypt; Indonesia; Argentina; Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group; China; Thailand; Tunisia; Tanzania, on behalf of the African Group; Ecuador; Senegal; Costa Rica; Mauritius; Colombia; El Salvador; Mali; Jamaica; the European Union; the United States of America; Switzerland; Japan; Norway; the United Kingdom; Brazil; Mozambique; Canada; Australia; Honduras; the Holy See; the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) took the floor.
88. The Chair invited the Secretariat to share procedural requirements.
89. The representative of the Secretariat took the floor.
90. The representative of the United States of America took the floor.
91. The Chair noted that the proposal had been submitted to the Council on 2 October 2020. Thus, the 90-day time-period would expire on 31 December 2020. For practical purposes, this would mean that the last opportunity for the Council to adopt the report envisaged by Article IX:3 (b) of the Marrakech Agreement, was before the end-year-break in December. In order to facilitate reconvening the Council to consider a report in this regard, she proposed to keep the agenda item open. She encouraged Members to further consult on the proposal and explore possibilities to bridge the gap.
92. The Council took note of the statements made and agreed to keep the agenda item open.
93. At the Council for TRIPS' reconvened formal meeting of 10 December 2020, the Chair reported that, on 20 November and on 3 December, she had convened the Council in informal open-ended mode to take stock of developments since the suspension in October, and to continue the consideration of the agenda item in informal mode. At these meetings delegations had highlighted their common goal of providing access to high-quality, safe, efficacious and affordable vaccines and medicines for all. Delegations had also exchanged views, sought clarifications and provided information on the operation, implementation and impact of the requested waiver during these meetings.
94. The Chair said she also held consultations in the time-period between 26 November and 1 December, in order to seek delegations' views on (a) what kind of report the TRIPS Council could likely agree on at today's meeting, and (b) how substantive engagement could be further facilitated, given the importance of meaningful and focused discussions on the substance of the proposal. In these consultations she had detected an emerging agreement that the TRIPS Council should provide a communication to the General Council that would be neutral and factual, and reflect the state of play of discussions and the absence of consensus on the waiver proposal in the TRIPS Council at this time. Delegations had also seen a need to continue discussions on the matter within the TRIPS Council.
95. On the basis of these consultations, and after discussions in the informal open-ended meeting on 3 December, an agenda item for a status report on the consideration of the waiver request was put on the proposed agenda of the next General Council meeting scheduled for 1617 December. During the informal meeting of 3 December, the Chair had circulated draft language for such an oral status report with an invitation to Members to comment on this language by 7 December. On the basis of the comments that were received by the deadline, she had held further consultations on 8 and 9 December, and had circulated a revised draft status report.
96. In light of these informal meetings and consultations, she proposed the Council agree that she would deliver an oral status report to the General Council as follows:
At the meeting of the TRIPS Council on 15-16 October 2020, India and South Africa introduced document IP/C/W/669, requesting a waiver from certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the prevention, containment and treatment of COVID-19, which had been circulated on 2 October 2020 and has since been co-sponsored by the delegations of Kenya, Eswatini, Pakistan, Mozambique, and Bolivia. The Council continued its discussions under that agenda item at its resumed meeting on 10 December 2020.
At those meetings, and at informal meetings on 20 November and 3 December, delegations highlighted the common goal of providing access to high-quality, safe, efficacious and affordable vaccines and medicines for all. Delegations exchanged views, sought clarifications and provided information on the waiver request but could not reach consensus. Delegations indicated a need for further discussions on the waiver request and views exchanged by delegations.
This means that the TRIPS Council has not yet completed its consideration of the waiver request and may not be able to do so within the 90 days stipulated in Article IX:3 of the Marrakesh Agreement. Therefore, the TRIPS Council will continue its consideration of the waiver request and report back to the General Council as stipulated in Article IX:3 of the Marrakesh Agreement.
97. The Council so agreed.
98. The Chair thanked all delegations, particularly those involved in the consultations, for the constructive spirit in which they had engaged in the discussions on this report. As regards the TRIPS Council's next steps, she noted that the next regular meeting is scheduled for 1011 March 2021. In order to allow for further consideration of the waiver request in the more immediate future, she proposed that the Council reserve 19 January and 4 February 2021 for meetings of the Council that could be dedicated to the discussion of the waiver request. The next regular meeting – with the usual complete agenda – would remain scheduled for 10-11 March.
99. The Council so agreed.
100. The representatives of Malaysia, Canada, Chile, Bolivia, Sri Lanka, Chad, Norway, Turkey, Singapore, Viet Nam, Eswatini, Egypt, Indonesia, the European Union, Japan, China, the United Kingdom, Oman, Mauritius, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Ukraine, the United States of America, Ecuador, the Republic of Korea, El Salvador, New Zealand, Mozambique, Brazil, Jamaica, India, Pakistan, Switzerland, Israel, Colombia, Bangladesh, Tanzania, on behalf of the African Group, Botswana, South Africa, Nepal and Vanuatu took the floor.
IP/C/M/96, IP/C/M/96/Add.1