Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Xolelwa Mlumbi-Peter (South Africa)
16 WORK PROGRAMME ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE

1519.   The delegation of Bangladesh endorses the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDCs. 1520.   Considering the high relevance of electronic commerce, the General Council in 1998, in its decision WT/L/274, established a work programme on electronic commerce and asked the four bodies, namely the Council for Trade in Goods, the Council for Trade in Services, the TRIPS Council and the Committee on Trade and Development to examine the issue of electronic commerce in relation to the work of their respective jurisdictions and report to the General Council accordingly. Other WTO bodies were also asked to inform the General Council of their activities relevant to electronic commerce. 1521.   The delegation of Bangladesh submitted a draft Ministerial decision document JOB/GC/152/Rev.1 in 2017. The main objective, among others, was to request the General Council to ask the four bodies to conclude the discussions on the work programme assigned to them and report to the General Council. 1522.   My delegation considers that the submission is still valid and should be further discussed to implement the General Council's decision. My delegation also requests that this item should also be kept in the agenda for the future meetings of the TRIPS Council.

101. The Chair recalled that the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce mandated the TRIPS Council to examine and report on the intellectual property issues arising in connection with electronic commerce, including protection and enforcement of copyright and related rights, protection and enforcement of trademarks, and new technologies and access to technology. In the General Council Decision of 10 December 2019, Members had agreed to reinvigorate the work under the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce, based on the existing mandate. The decision foresaw structured discussions "based on all traderelated topics of interest brought forward by Members, including LDCs".
102. The other bodies that were directly mandated by the Work Programme – the Council for Trade in Services, the Council for Trade in Goods, and the Committee on Trade and Development – had retained this item on their regular agenda. In the TRIPS Council, the item had been taken up repeatedly since 1999, with some significant gaps, but Members had not agreed to treat this as a regular agenda item. More recently, there had been intermittent reference to, and discussion of, the item based on ad hoc agenda items in 2017 and 2018 and, most recently, at the last Council meeting on 30 July 2020.
103. During the consultations held in September 2020, several delegations had signalled their interest in re-engagement on this matter, including on discussing national digital policy efforts and the issue of access to digital technology. Some Members had encouraged delegations to provide proposals and submissions in advance of the meetings, echoing the General Council Decision's reference to "topics of interest brought forward by Members". Considering this feedback, she had proposed the item of electronic commerce, again, for the agenda of the present meeting in order to provide an opportunity to discuss how the Council should discharge its mandate under the Work Programme in the future.
104. She was under the impression that Members had brought forward a number of topics, both during the September 2020 consultations and at Council's meeting on 30 July 2020, on which the Council could have structured discussions, as mandated by the Work Programme, if Members were interested to pursue them. If this was the case, the TRIPS Council might wish to keep this item on the regular agenda, as was the case in the other regular bodies mandated by the Work Programme and establish a structure for its discussions, in order to respond to the Ministerial mandate in this regard. She invited Members to share any thoughts on the substance of the discussions on electronic commerce and on how to treat the item on the Council's agenda in the future.
105. The representatives of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group; China; Bangladesh; South Africa; Tanzania, on behalf of the African Group; the United States of America; the European Union; Indonesia; Australia; and India took the floor.
106. The Council took note of the statements made.
IP/C/M/96, IP/C/M/96/Add.1