Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

Ms Irene Young (Hong Kong, China)
3; 4; 5 REVIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 27.3(B); RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE
70. On the Review of the Provisions of Article 27.3(b), my delegation does not support the patenting of life forms comprising plants and animals. We call for the review of this Article in order to protect developing countries and LDCs from the negative effects of this provision on the key sectors that affect their livelihood such as agriculture, health, food and climate change. This would help ensure inter alia: food security and preserve the integrity of rural and local communities. Patenting of life forms at a multilateral level should be prohibited. 71. On the relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the CBD, we hold that states have the right and duty to protect their traditional knowledge and genetic resources. There is therefore need to amend the TRIPS Agreement with the view to require patent applicants relating to biological materials to provide information on the source and country of origin of biological resources and traditional knowledge used in the invention. 72. In addition, the applicants must show evidence of prior informed consent from, and benefit sharing arrangements with, the authorities and or persons under the relevant national regime. This disclosure requirement, which is consistent with the transparency principle established in the multilateral trading system, will help to reduce the number of erroneous patents and bio piracy. We believe that whilst traditional knowledge should receive legal recognition, its protection could as well contribute significantly to the achievement of development goals.
The Council took note of the statements made and agreed to revert to the matters at its next meeting.
14. The Chairperson said that, as she had already noted during the previous two meetings, Members had seen important developments in this area over the last decade, but had not shared those developments with the TRIPS Council. Particularly, there had been no responses or updates, since 2003, to the Illustrative List of Questions on Article 27.3(b) (IP/C/W/122), and only 25 Members had responded at all. Likewise, there had been no notifications of domestic mechanisms to protect genetic resources and traditional knowledge. She encouraged Members to submit responses to this Checklist or update their previous responses; as well as notify any relevant changes in their legislation.

15. The representatives of Ecuador; India; Brazil; China; the Plurinational State of Bolivia; South Africa; Canada; Bangladesh; Cuba; Chile; Indonesia; Haiti, on behalf of the LDC Group; the United States; Japan; Switzerland; and Australia took the floor.

16. The Chairperson encouraged Members to have further discussions to resolve the outstanding procedural issues.

17. The Council took note of the statements made and agreed to revert to the matters at its next meeting.

IP/C/M/88, IP/C/M/88/Add.1