Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Lundeg Purevsuren
2 NOTIFICATIONS UNDER PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT

2.   Since Australia last updated the Council under this agenda item, we have introduced further legislative and regulatory changes, which have been notified to the WTO Secretariat using the eTRIPS platform. 3.   In brief, the changes are as follows: a. First, the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Productivity Commission Response Part 1 and Other Measures) Act 2018 [IP/N/1/AUS/19]:  clarifies the circumstances in which the parallel importation of trademarked goods does not infringe a registered trademark;  changes the period that must elapse before certain non-use actions of a trademark can be taken;  closes a loophole to improve how essentially derived variety declarations can be made for plant breeders' rights;  removes a requirement for patentees to provide certain data relating to pharmaceutical patents with an extended term; and  implements a number of measures intended to streamline and harmonise the administration of the Australian IP system. b. Second, new regulations were introduced to give effect to these legislative amendments [IP/N/1/AUS/20]. c. Third, the Wine Australia Regulations 2018 [IP/N/1/AUS/21] were introduced, replacing the former Australian Grape and Wine Authority Regulations, which were automatically repealed according to a pre-determine deadline. The new Regulations removed redundant provisions, simplified language and restructured provisions for ease of use. d. Fourth, the Copyright (International Protection) Amendment Regulations 2018 [IP/N/1/AUS/18] extended protection for secondary uses of sound recordings in Australia to recordings from an additional 32 countries which provide equivalent protection to Australian sound recordings. e. Fifth, the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2018 [IP/N/1/AUS/17] amended the online copyright infringement scheme in section 115A of the Copyright Act 1968, which is aimed at allowing the Federal Court of Australia to issue injunctions requiring the blocking of access by users in Australia to overseas online locations that facilitate large-scale infringement of copyright. f. Sixth, the Copyright Amendment (Service Providers) Act 2018 [IP/N/1/AUS/15] extended the operation of the safe harbour scheme in the Copyright Act 1968 and limited legal remedies available against carriage service providers to a broader range of service providers in the disability, educational and cultural sectors g. And finally, new regulations were introduced to give effect to the legislative amendments contained in this Act [IP/N/1/AUS/16].

The Council took note of the notifications and the statements made.
4.   The Chair invited the Secretariat to report on notifications that the Council had received since its meeting in February 2019.
5.   A representative of the Secretariat said that the Council had received the following notifications under Article 63.2 of the TRIPS Agreement:
a. Australia had notified amendments to its Copyright Act and Regulations relating to: service provider safe harbour scheme; online infringement scheme allowing blocking of access to online locations; and to the international extension of the protection for secondary uses of sound recordings. It had also notified the Wine Australia Regulations regarding the protection of geographical indications, and the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Act and Regulations, which implemented changes across Australia's IP system in response to a Report by the Australian Government's Productivity Commission.
b. Cuba had notified legislation concerning its Industrial Property System; the regulation of industrial design protection; the regulation of plant variety protection; and provisions for the national implementation of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). It had further notified legislation on the remuneration of inventors, authors, and other holders of intellectual property rights. Finally, it had also notified laws relating to unfair practices in industrial property, and to the use of restrictive contractual clauses in industrial property matters.
c. The European Union had notified legislation relating to the protection of geographical indications.
d. Hungary had notified legislation amending its Act on the protection of Trademarks and Geographical Indications.
e. Japan had notified a consolidated version of the Patent Act that introduces a new system of patent fees. It had also notified an Act concerning the fees for international patent applications pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
f. Chinese Taipei had notified amendments to its Patent Attorney Act.
6.   Under Article 69, Angola and Tonga had provided information on contact points for the exchange of information and cooperation on trade in infringing goods. Under Article 67, Chile had provided information on its contact point on technical and financial cooperation. The Members' transparency toolkit page would be updated accordingly. Since the circulation of the agenda, other notifications had been submitted. The relevant delegations might mention them in their interventions, as appropriate.
7.   The Chair invited delegations that had notified new or revised legislative measures, or submitted updates to their contact points, to introduce their notifications. He also invited other delegations to comment on them.
8.   The representatives of Australia, Japan, Cuba, Chinese Taipei, the European Union, Canada and the United States of America took the floor.
9.   The Chair noted that notifications to the Council were not keeping up with the actual development of laws and regulations relating to TRIPS. He emphasized that Article 63.2 was not a one-off requirement. It was a core element of the TRIPS transparency arrangements, a central part of the Council's substantive work, and obliged Members to notify any new or amended laws. He urged Members to complete any outstanding initial notifications and to keep up to date notifications of subsequent amendments. The same applied to the Checklist of Issues on Enforcement, which had been established by the Council as an element of Members' notification obligations. The e-TRIPS platform made it much easier to fulfil these transparency obligations.
10.   The Chair encouraged Members to notify legislative changes made to implement the special compulsory licensing system to export medicines covered by the new Article 31bis of the TRIPS Agreement. At least 56 WTO Members, including many of the world's major exporters of medicines, had adopted implementing legislation that allowed them to use the System as exporters and/or importers. But only 19 Members, including the European Union, had formally notified such measures to the TRIPS Council. The notification of all relevant laws and regulations could assist Members in preparing for the potential use of the System. It would also help the Secretariat in its efforts to provide informed technical support to Members in this area.
11.   The Chair noted that the Secretariat had completed work on the e-TRIPS System. In March, delegations had been informed that the e-TRIPS Submissions System was available online. Several Members had already used the e-TRIPS system to make submissions for this meeting. He announced that another part of the system, the e-TRIPS Gateway, was ready for presentation to delegations. The Secretariat had already commenced informal demonstrations of its potential to support delegations in your work. He invited the Secretariat to present the TRIPS system.
12.   A representative of the Secretariat briefed Members on the development of e-TRIPS.
13.   The representatives of Mexico and Australia took the floor.
14.   The Council took note of the notifications and the statements made.
IP/C/M/92, IP/C/M/92/Add.1, IP/C/M/92/Corr.1