93. Regarding this agenda, we have already discussed for a long time at a series of meetings of the TRIPS Council. The delegation of Japan, therefore, believes that our position is well-known among Members, so this time we would like to focus on some major points in our intervention.
94. This delegation would like to reiterate our position that the convention on biological diversity is by nature not relevant with the intellectual property system and it is necessary to seek appropriate ways to deal with the misappropriation of genetic resources. This means we should bear in mind that any measures taken must not adversely affect the existing intellectual property system or hinder the creation of innovations utilizing genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge.
95. This delegation is firmly convinced that the disclosure requirement would discourage industries from conducting research and development activities on biological materials outside their own countries. This is the very consequence of the disclosure requirement that Japan has been concerned about. Therefore, Japan believes that the disclosure requirement is not an appropriate means for dealing with such misappropriation, so therefore, we have to make sure not to include it in the intellectual property system.
96. In addition, this delegation believes the WIPO IGC is the most appropriate forum for holding technical discussions on Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore from IP aspects. Based on the mandate which is renewed in the last WIPO General Assembly, the 36th Session of IGC will be held this month and deal with the issues regarding to genetic resources, using evidence-based approach.