140. We thank you for leading the small group discussion prior to this meeting. It was very useful for us in engaging with the stakeholders in a more informal way.
141. As we mentioned on earlier occasions, my delegation's position on the proposed lifting of moratorium on the non-violation and situation complaints is well-known. We would like to see a permanent moratorium in this regard.
142. However, we would like to hear from the proponents of the application their views and ideas about the scope and modalities of proceedings related to non-violation and situation complaints as required by Article 64.3 of the TRIPS Agreement. Only then, the Council will be in a better position to examine and consider the proposal. The concept is still an unknown territory, and unless the scope and modalities are perceived first, we cannot go any further in this discussion.
143. As we perceive it now, if non-violation and situation complaints are made applicable to TRIPS, any issue under the sun can be brought as cases under this umbrella. Clear delimitations, therefore, need to be conceived and thoroughly examined first. We, however, reiterate our readiness to engage with any interested delegations.