Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Dr Walter Werner
13 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST: PROMOTING PUBLIC HEALTH THROUGH COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY
461.   For the purpose of having meaningful discussions under this agenda item, the delegation of Japan would like to ask other Members to note that it might be better to take a more thorough and cautious approach, taking into account not only the interests of third parties but also those of patent rights holders. As this delegation reiterated, the HLP report should not constitute the basis for this discussion. 462.   In this context, this delegation would also like to point out that provisions such as those in Article 31(k) and Article 40 of the TRIPS Agreement, rest on an intricate balance. Therefore, Japan believes that we should be cautious in discussing this agenda item. And these provisions should not be interpreted too broadly. Any measures taken under these provisions should be fully consistent with the TRIPS Agreement. From this perspective, this delegation shares the concern generally expressed by the United States delegation about document IP/C/W/643.
44.   The Chair said that China and South Africa had initially requested the agenda item on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest: Promoting Public Health through Competition Law and Policy". It had also been cosponsored by Brazil and India. A communication had been circulated in document IP/C/W/643 and its addendum.
45.   The representatives of South Africa; Brazil; China; India; Indonesia; the United States; the European Union; Switzerland; the Republic of Korea; Australia; Japan; New Zealand; and UNCTAD took the floor.
46.   The Council took note of the statements made.
IP/C/M/89, IP/C/M/89/Add.1