Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Lundeg Purevsuren
1 NOTIFICATIONS UNDER PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT

4.   Canada is pleased to take this opportunity to present notifications IP/N/1/CAN/20 and IP/N/1/CAN/21, on recent amendments to Canada's Trademarks Act, as well as Canada's new Industrial Design Regulations, respectively. 5.   Canada's first notification for this meeting (IP/N/1/CAN/20) provides an overview of recent amendments to Canada's Trademarks Act under Bill C-79 (An Act to implement the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership between Canada, Australia, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Viet Nam). Bill C-79 amends the Trademarks Act to expand the application of subsections 53(1) and 53.1(1) to apply to goods that have a mark applied to them that is confusing with a registered trademark. The amendments to Canada's Trademarks Act received Royal Assent and entered into force on 25 October 2018. 6.   Canada's second notification (IP/N/1/CAN/20) introduces Canada's new Industrial Design Regulations. The new Industrial Design Regulations carry out amendments made to the Industrial Design Act by Bill C-43, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on 11 February 2014 and other measures (as previously notified under IP/N/1/CAN/D/3), which facilitate Canada's accession to the Hague Agreement, and modernize Canada's industrial design regime. The amendments to the Industrial Design Act and the new Industrial Design Regulations entered into force on 5 November 2018. By joining the Hague Agreement, Canadian businesses and innovators will have access to an efficient and effective means of protecting their industrial designs around the world. The modernization measures will also update, codify and improve aspects of Canada's industrial design regime, aligning it with our key trading partners, reducing red tape for business and improving e-services for Canadian clients. 7.   Canada would also like to take the opportunity to briefly notify four notifications on recent amendments to Canada's Patent Act, Trademarks Act, and Copyright Act, as well as the enactment of the College of Patent and Trademark Agents, under Bill C-86 (A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on 27 February 2018 and other measures). 8.   Bill C-86 includes amendments to Canada's Patent Act to establish a regime for written demand letters relating to patents, and also codifies the research exemption in Canadian law. Bill C-86 also amends the Act to specify that licensing commitments that bind the owner of a standard essential patent bind any subsequent owners. Bill C-86 also amends the Act to expand the rights of a person in respect of a claim in a patent who meets the requirements to be considered a prior use. 9.   With respect to Canada's Trademarks Act, Bill C-86 amends the Act to add bad faith as a ground of opposition to the registration of a trademark and for the invalidation of a trademark registration. It also amends the act to prevent the owner of a registered trademark from obtaining relief for certain acts during the first three years after the trademark is registered, unless the trademark was in use in Canada during that period (or special circumstances exist that excuse the absence of use). Bill C-86 also includes amendments to clarify that certain prohibitions of the Trademarks Act do not apply with respect to a badge, crest, emblem, or mark that was the subject of a public notice of adoption and use as an official mark if the entity that made the request for the public notice is not a public authority or no longer exists. As well, Bill C-86 modernizes the conduct of various proceedings before the Register of Trademarks, and also makes certain housekeeping amendments to provisions of the Act. 10.   Bill C-86 also amends the Copyright Act in order to specify that certain information is not permitted to be included within a notice under Canada's "notice-and-notice" regime for Internet service provider liability, and to provide for a regulation-making power to prohibit further types of information from being included within such a notice. Bill C-86 also amends the Act to modernize the legislative framework relating to the Canadian Copyright Board so as to improve the timeliness and clarity of its proceedings and decision-making processes. 11.   Finally, Bill C-86 enacts the College of Patent Agents and Trademark Agents Act, which establishes Canada's College of Patent Agents and Trademark Agents. The College is to be responsible for the regulation of patent agents and trademark agents in the public interest. 12.   We would like to thank the Secretariat for accommodating our submission of these notifications prior to this meeting, and note that they will be circulated to TRIPS Council in due course.

The Council took note of the notifications and the statements made.
1.   The Chair invited the Secretariat to report on notifications that the Council had received since its meeting in June 2019.
2.   A representative of the Secretariat said that the Council had received the following notifications under Article 63.2 of the TRIPS Agreement:
a. Canada had notified an act that implemented the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) in the trademark area; new Industrial Design Regulations that facilitated Canada's accession to the Hague Agreement concerning the international Registration of Industrial Designs; and amendments resulting from the College of Patents and Trademark Agents Act, which has an effect on various intellectual property laws;
b. Mexico had notified the General Declaration on Protection of the Appellation of Origin Raicilla;
c. Mauritius had notified amendments to its Copyright Act which made provisions on phonograms; lengthened the period of copyright protection; and introduced provisions regarding the Mauritius Society of Authors;
d. Japan had notified amendments to its Trademark, Patents and Designs Acts aimed at ensuring the confidentiality of documents that contain trade secrets during certification process; as well as a revised Unfair Competition Prevention Act that provides civil remedies against acts of unfair competition with respect to protected data; and
e. Chinese Taipei had notified amendments to its Patent and Copyright Acts.
3.   He added that, under Article 69, Maldives, Indonesia, Afghanistan and Kazakhstan had provided information on contact points for the exchange of information and cooperation on trade in infringing goods. The European Union and Kazakhstan had provided updates to their previous responses to the Checklist of Issues on Enforcement.
4.   The Chair invited delegations that had notified new or revised legislative measures, or submitted updates to their contact points, to introduce their notifications. He also invited other delegations to comment on them.
5.   The representatives of Mexico; Canada; Chinese Taipei; Japan; Mauritius; and Brazil took the floor.
6.   The Chair noted that notifications to the Council were not keeping up with the actual development of laws and regulations relating to TRIPS. He emphasized that Article 63.2 was not a one-off requirement. It was a core element of the TRIPS transparency arrangements, a central part of the Council's substantive work, and obliged Members to notify any new or amended laws. He urged Members to complete any outstanding initial notifications and to keep up to date notifications of subsequent amendments. The same applied to the Checklist of Issues on Enforcement, which had been established by the Council as an element of Members' notification obligations. The e-TRIPS platform made it much easier to fulfil these transparency obligations.
7.   The Chair encouraged Members to notify legislative changes made to implement the special compulsory licensing system to export medicines covered by the new Article 31bis of the TRIPS Agreement. More than 50 WTO Members, including many of the world's major exporters of medicines, had adopted implementing legislation that allowed them to use the System as exporters and/or importers. But only 19 Members, including the European Union, had formally notified such measures to the TRIPS Council. The notification of all relevant laws and regulations could assist Members in preparing for the potential use of the System. It would also help the Secretariat in its efforts to provide informed technical support to Members in this area.
8.   The Chair invited the Secretariat to provide an update on the e-TRIPS system.
9.   A representative of the Secretariat briefed Members on the development of e-TRIPS.
10.   The Council took note of the notifications and the statements made.
IP/C/M/93, IP/C/M/93/Add.1