Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Xolelwa Mlumbi-Peter
464.   We once again welcome the LDC Group's request for an extension of the transition period under Article 66.1. 465.   We know that development is a lengthy and multi-faceted process. In this regard, economic, financial and institutional challenges faced by LDCs with regard to compliance with the TRIPS Agreement deserve special attention. Extending the transition period will facilitate LDCs' need to have policy space and flexibility to address their development challenges and to create a viable technological base. And now with the impact of COVID-19, assisting LDCs is more important than ever. Thus, Turkey fully understands LDCs' need for flexibility. 466.   In light of this approach, Turkey is a significant donor country to LDCs and implements several programmes to contribute to their development in the framework of the Istanbul Programme of Action of 2011. Turkey has hosted the UN Technology Bank for LDCs since 2018, which aims to help them with necessary capacity building in intellectual property rights, creating innovation, conducting the transfer of technology, and so on. 467.   We believe that having constructive discussions among Members on this request is crucial and we hope that consensus could be reached soon.
60. The Chair recalled that the transition period for least-developed country Members had been extended twice; most recently, by the TRIPS Council decision of 11 June 2013, and was currently set to expire on 1 July 2021, which was in less than four months' time. Regarding extensions of this period, the second sentence of Article 66.1 of the TRIPS Agreement provided that "The Council for TRIPS shall, upon duly motivated request by a least developed country Member, accord extensions of this period."
61. The LDC Group had circulated its request for an extension on 1 October 2020. Since then, she had held small-group consultations on this issue on 22 December 2020 and on 10 February 2021. From these consultations, her impression was that delegations were in principle favourable to extending the transition period for LDCs. As regards the specific modalities of such extension, some delegations expressed full support for the extension as requested, some expressed a preference for extending the period for a limited number of years, and others had additional questions on how the request for a transition period for graduated LDCs related to Article 66.1.
62. She reminded delegations of the limited time remaining before the current transition period expired and urged them to focus their interventions on any specific outstanding questions they might have, and to consider making concrete suggestions on possible outcomes, with a view to adopting a decision on extension at the next TRIPS Council meeting in June 2021.
63. The representatives of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group; Bangladesh, on behalf of the LDC Group; the United Kingdom; South Africa; Chile; Tanzania, on behalf of the African Group; Turkey; China; India; Australia; Switzerland; the United States of America; Egypt; the European Union; Chinese Taipei; Tunisia; Japan; Indonesia; Nepal; and the Holy See took the floor.
64. The Chair proposed that the Council request the incoming Chair to hold consultations on this matter, with a view to working towards a concrete outcome for the June meeting.
65. The Council took note of the statements made and agreed to revert to the matter at its next meeting.
IP/C/M/98, IP/C/M/98/Add.1