Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Dagfinn Sørli (Norway)
European Union
388.   The European Union over the last couple of weeks has been engaging in a very active manner in discussions with various delegations aiming to identify areas of convergence that could become the basis for a meaningful and pragmatic compromise on the intellectual property component of the trade response. Both the Geneva representatives and the capital-based experts have had talks with various delegations. Discussions also took place at the level of senior officials. This effort is ongoing. 389.   In order to find a compromise, given the short time remaining until MC12, we believe that we all have to be clear on what parameters we find essential for a solution on the intellectual property element of the broader trade response to the pandemic. Given the scope of divergences, we all need to be ready to adjust our initial positions and focus on the effect of the solution. Also, the solution we need is clearly one that would add to the ongoing collaborations and efforts to maximize production and supply, especially for the regions that have not had sufficient supplies of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics, and not a solution that could interfere with these efforts. 390.   The European Union will continue to work towards such a solution together. We strongly believe that it is possible, taking all the elements of the comprehensive trade response into account, to find an outcome that will make a real difference on the ground.
121. The Chair recalled that on 4 June 2021, the Council had received a communication from the European Union on "Urgent Trade Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Crisis: Intellectual Property".(document ), which had been followed on 18 June 2021 by a "Draft General Council Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health in the Circumstances of a Pandemic".(document ).
122. The European Union had introduced its proposed declaration during an informal meeting held on 24 June 2021. The proposal had also been discussed during informal meetings held on 30 June and 6 and 14 July, and at a formal meeting on 20 July. It had since been discussed at every meeting dedicated to discussing the revised TRIPS waiver proposal under the previous agenda item. As part of the TRIPS Council's status reports to the General Council on the revised waiver request on 27 July and on 4 October, Members had reported that the TRIPS Council would also continue its consideration of the EU's proposal.
123. The representatives of the United Kingdom; Pakistan; Cuba; Republic of Korea; Singapore; Turkey; China; Switzerland; Norway; Brazil; Mozambique; India; and the European Union took the floor.
124. The Chair thanked the delegations for their interventions. Noting that the consideration of the present item was closely linked to the previous one, he suggested to also suspend the conclusion of this agenda item, so that it could be taken up together with the waiver discussion, when the Council resumed these items.
125. The Council took note of the statements made and agreed to keep the agenda item open.
126. At the reconvened meeting of 18 November, the report to the General Council was adopted and the Chair said that, it was therefore understood that the agenda items 13 and 14 on the Council's agenda continued to remain open in order to permit more time for bilateral engagement, with a view to resuming – at short notice if necessary – the meeting, when there were indications that Members might be ready to reach an agreement. [see paragraphs 93-99]
127. At the reconvened meeting of 29 November, the Chair proposed to take agenda items 13 and 14 together, as delegations had been making a single statement. [see paragraphs 100-107]
128. At the reconvened meeting of 16 December, the Chair proposed to take agenda items 13 and 14 together, as delegations had been making a single statement. [see paragraphs 108-119]
IP/C/M/103, IP/C/M/103/Add.1