Actas - Consejo de los ADPIC - Ver detalles de la intervención/declaración

Ambassador Alfredo Suescum (Panama)
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
6 REVIEW UNDER PARAGRAPH 8 OF THE DECISION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PARAGRAPH 6 OF THE DOHA DECLARATION ON THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH
111. During the period November 2012 – September 2013, legislative and policy advice on patents that referred or included considerations regarding the Paragraph 6 System has been provided by the WIPO as follows: • At the request of four Member States, WIPO Secretariat drafted laws and/or prepared comments on draft laws which included reference to, or implemented, the Paragraph 6 System. • In the framework of legislative assistance on patents, matters related to health policies, including the Paragraph 6 System, were also addressed in the context of six missions that were undertaken in Member States and eight consultations that took place in WIPO headquarters in Geneva. • Legislative implementation of patent law matters related to health policies, including the implementation of the Paragraph 6 System, were addressed in the following seminars or meetings: a. WIPO Regional Seminar for Certain African Countries on the Implementation and Use of several Patent-Related Flexibilities, Durban, South Africa, 29 to 31/01/2013; b. WIPO Sub-Regional Workshop on Patent Policy and its Legislative Implementation, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis, 10 and 11/04/2013; c. WIPO-Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF) Sub-Regional Workshop on Trade of Services for the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), Douala, Cameroon, 6 to 9/08/2013. 112. During the period under consideration, the World Intellectual Property Organization also participated at the following WTO Seminars where the topic of patent-related flexibilities, with a reference to the Paragraph 6 System, has been dealt with: a. WTO Regional Workshop for Latin American Countries on TRIPS and Public Policies, Bogotá, Colombia, 16 to 18/04/2013; b. WTO National Seminar on TRIPS and Public Health, Luanda, Angola, 10 and 11/07/2013; c. WTO Regional Workshop on IP and Public Health, Arusha, Tanzania, 29 to 31/05/2013; and d. WTO National Workshop on TRIPS Flexibilities, Pretoria, South Africa, August 6 to 8, 2013. 113. WIPO's assistance is consistently based on the multilateral legal framework. More recently, a number of national authorities in charge of drafting laws have been seeking advice from WIPO regarding how to use the available multilateral flexibilities so as to accommodate particular national interests that are specific to their countries. Since the Paragraph 6 System is part of those flexibilities which are considered by several countries as part of their access-to-medicine policies, this issue is regularly covered by WIPO legislative and policy assistance. 114. The following is an update on WIPO Re:Search. One of the world's great global health challenges is to overcome the impact of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), malaria and tuberculosis. These diseases negatively affect the lives of more than one billion people, many of whom live in the world's least developed countries. To generate more investment in innovation directed at these diseases, the World Intellectual Property Organization in cooperation with public and private sector partners launched WIPO Re:Search in 2011. As reported to the TRIPS Council in October 2011 and November 2012, WIPO Re:Search is a platform addressed to catalyze more research in NTDs, malaria, and tuberculosis by facilitating the sharing of IP assets and resources among public and private sector partners and researchers in this important field. By providing a searchable, public database of available IP assets (for example, pharmaceutical compounds, know-how and data available for research and development), WIPO Re:Search facilitates new partnerships to support organizations that conduct research on treatments for those diseases. 115. WIPO Re:Search was launched on 26/10/2011, with about 30 members, including pharmaceutical companies, research institutions and a range of public and private entities. To date, WIPO Re:Search has more than doubled its membership, with 76 members currently, including more than ten African members from the academia and the public and private sectors. Since our report in 2012 to the TRIPS Council, thanks to WIPO Re:search over 30 collaborations have been initiated, and more are in development. 116. Also, thanks to a Funds-in-Trust provided to WIPO by the Government of Australia, five scientists from five African countries – Cameroon, Egypt, Ghana, Nigeria, and South Africa – are working in research labs of WIPO Re:Search members in India, Switzerland and the USA, where they are upgrading their R&D management skills and furthering their research work. 117. WIPO Re:Search is founded on the belief that intellectual property and knowledge can be used creatively to stimulate more investment in research and development for new health solutions. Intellectually property should be used to make a positive contribution. WIPO Re:Search works entirely on a voluntary basis of all participating parties and has no impact on any legal instrument. The WIPO Re:Search website http://www.wipo.int/research provides further information.
The Council so agreed.
6.1. The Chairman suggested that, in light of the consultations he had held on the preparations for the tenth annual review under paragraph 8 of the Decision on the Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, the Council follow the standard format in the present review. Accordingly, after introducing the item and any relevant recent developments, the floor would be opened to delegations for comments. This was how the Council had conducted most of the reviews, including the previous review, although in 2010 and 2011, the Council had had in place more elaborated procedures that had been agreed in advance, including a set of topics and questions to guide the discussion.

6.2. He said that the records of earlier reviews, including the exchange of questions and responses, continued to provide a unique and valuable resource for understanding this important measure and could also inform discussions at the present review. He had therefore encouraged delegations to consult this material, recorded in the minutes of previous reviews, and consider whether there was any issues they would wish to follow up.

6.3. As regards the purpose of the review, he recalled that paragraph 8 of the waiver Decision provided that the Council for TRIPS would annually review the functioning of the System set out in the Decision with a view to ensuring its effective operation and annually report on its operation to the General Council. Such a review would be deemed to fulfil the review requirements of Article IX:4 of the WTO Agreement.

6.4. The Secretariat had circulated a draft cover note for the Council's report modelled on previous years' reports (JOB/IP/9). It contained factual information on the implementation and use of the System established under the Decision and on the status of acceptances of the Protocol Amending the TRIPS Agreement. In accordance with the way that the Council had prepared its report in previous years, the part of the minutes of the meeting that reflected the discussions held under the agenda item could be attached to the cover note.

6.5. Paragraph 8 of the cover note contained a list of Members that had notified their acceptance of the Protocol. The Chairman said that Chile and Montenegro, on 26 July and 9 September 2013 respectively, had deposited their instruments of acceptance since the Council's last meeting in June. In addition, since the circulation of the draft report, Trinidad and Tobago had also accepted the Protocol (WT/Let/894). Paragraph 8 would need to be updated accordingly.

6.6. The Chairman clarified a frequently asked question on how the acceptance of the Protocol related to the implementation of the Paragraph 6 System in a Member’s domestic legal framework. He said that these were two entirely separate acts, in other words, the Protocol could be accepted independently from adopting domestic implementing legislation. By accepting the Protocol, a Member in essence expressed its consent that other WTO Members were entitled to use the additional flexibility that the System provided. Should a WTO Member wish to take advantage itself of those additional flexibilities, the adoption of appropriate domestic legislative measures could be required. He emphasized that, since these two processes were entirely separate, a Member could choose to deposit an instrument of acceptance of the Protocol without the need to wait for any domestic implementation. In fact, a number of instruments of acceptance that the WTO had received had been deposited before the Member in question had adopted any domestic implementing legislation.

6.7. The representatives of the United States, India, Canada, China, Australia, Japan, the European Union, Cuba, Switzerland, Chile and El Salvador, as well as of the WTO Secretariat and the WIPO Secretariat took the floor under this agenda item. The statements will be reproduced in an addendum to the present record.

6.8. The Council took note of the statements made.

6.9. Turning to the report to the General Council on the annual review of the Paragraph 6 System, the Chairman said that the Secretariat had circulated a draft cover note for the Council's report modelled on previous years' reports (JOB/IP/9). It contained factual information on the implementation and use of the System established under the Decision and on the status of acceptances of the Protocol Amending the TRIPS Agreement. In accordance with the way that the Council had prepared its reports in the previous years, the part of the minutes of the meeting that reflected the discussions held under the agenda item could be attached to the cover note.

6.10. As regards paragraph 8 of the cover note to the report, he recalled that Trinidad and Tobago had also recently accepted the Protocol. This paragraph would be updated accordingly.

6.11. The Protocol had originally been open for acceptance by Members until 1 December 2007. Upon proposals by the TRIPS Council, the General Council had three times extended that period for further two-year periods. The period for acceptance was currently due to expire on 31 December 2013. Given the proximity of this date, the Chairman suggested that the Council consider again submitting a proposal to the General Council for a decision to extend the period for the acceptance of the Protocol. For that purpose, a draft decision that could be submitted to the General Council for adoption was included in Annex 2 to the draft report. It did not yet contain a new deadline for the extended period for acceptances. In the light of the consultations he had held on this matter, he suggested that the Council propose to extend the period by a further two years until 31 December 2015.

6.12. The Chairman proposed that the Council agree on forwarding to the General Council the proposal for a decision to extend the period of acceptance by Members of the Protocol Amending the TRIPS Agreement until 31 December 2015. He suggested that the last paragraph of the draft decision by the General Council contained in Annex 2 to the draft report be complemented by inserting this date. He also proposed that the Council agree on the cover note to the report contained in JOB/IP/9, with the update to paragraph 8 concerning Trinidad and Tobago, and also that the Council minutes containing the record of the discussion be attached to it.

6.13. The Council so agreed.

IP/C/M/74, IP/C/M/74/Add.1