Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

Ambassador Eduardo Pérez Motta (Mexico)
B.i Follow-up to reviews already undertaken
9. The Chairman recalled that, at the previous meeting, it had been noted that five Members whose reviews had been initiated in June 2001 had questions outstanding. Since then, Cameroon and Grenada had provided responses to most of the outstanding questions (documents IP/C/W/302/Add.1 and IP/C/W/301/Add.1, respectively), but there were still a few initial questions posed to these Members that remained to be responded. 10. No other further responses had been obtained since the last meeting. Congo still had some outstanding initial and follow-up questions and Suriname some follow-up questions. Guyana had not yet provided responses to any initial questions. 11. He said that the Secretariat had received answers to all questions, including follow-up questions, from Namibia (document IP/C/W/248 and addenda), and proposed that the review of the legislation of Namibia be deleted from the agenda, it being understood that any delegation should feel free to revert to any matter stemming from this review at any time.
IP/C/M/36/Add.1