Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Dr. Walter Werner
United States of America
10   SIXTEENTH ANNUAL REVIEW UNDER PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE DECISION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 66.2 OF THE TRIPS AGREEMENT

228.   The United States attributes great importance to this review with respect to the obligations under Article 66.2 TRIPS. 229.   Our submission this year, IP/C/W/646, is a new report, detailing the intellectual property, trade capacity, training, development assistance, educational, financing, entrepreneurship, and infrastructure-related programmes, aimed to support LDCs in fostering the necessary environment to encourage the effective, voluntary transfer of technology to LDC Members. This year's submission also includes comments from host countries regarding the value of several of the programmes listed in the report. 230.   The United States continues to believe that the effective functioning of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement's requires a robust dialogue between developed country Members and LDC Members in order to target incentives in a way that is most responsive to the self-identified technology transfer interests and needs of LDC Members. 231.   We welcomed the 7 November logistical discussions with LDC Members and the Secretariat and we look forward to Article 66.2 Workshop on 11-12 February 2019 which will provide an opportunity to continue to exchange views and to further address important questions. 232.   Please allow me to mention some elements contained in our 2018 report, highlighting a few programme updates. 233.   The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) works with the Ministry of Health in Liberia to improve its ability to communicate priority information with frontline health workers. Communication during the Ebola outbreak was a critical challenge. To address this, USAID worked with the Ministry to integrate a text message platform, mHero, into their existing health information systems. This allows the Ministry to send information to health workers in specific counties in a matter of minutes. Today, mHero is used on a regular basis by a variety of departments within the Ministry of Health to inform health governance and service delivery. 234.   Also, in Togo, MoLab is the United States Embassy's mobile S.T.E.M. (science, technology, engineering and math) learning lab. Built by young Togolese inventors, it is a vehicle filled with science, engineering, chemistry, and math activities. The United States Embassy and Contour Global, an American energy company with a plant in Togo, financed MoLab. Its mission is to bring STEM education to under-resourced rural schools, and it has a full calendar of activities. By next year, it expects to be fully financially independent through private sector and crowd-sourced donations. 235.   We look forward to further discussing our report in greater detail with LDC Members at the February workshop.

The Council took note of the statements made and agreed to revert to the matter at its next meeting.
37.   The Chair recalled that under the TRIPS Council decision of February 2003, developed country Members were to submit annual reports on actions taken or planned in pursuance of their commitments under Article 66.2. They were to provide new detailed reports every third year and updates in the intervening years. In June 2018, the Council had requested developed country Members to submit the sixth set of new reports in time for the present meeting, and the Secretariat had since circulated a reminder.
38.   The Council had received new detailed reports from the United States of America, Switzerland, Australia, Japan and Canada. Since the circulation of the revised agenda, Norway had also submitted its new report. This documentation had been circulated in document IP/C/W/646 and addenda. In addition, shortly before the meeting, the Council had received the reports from New Zealand, as well as from the European Union and some of its member States, namely Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Advance copies of both reports had been made available as room documents on documents online and would also be circulated as addenda to document IP/C/W/646.
39.   Paragraph 2 of the Council's Decision on the Implementation of Article 66.2 explained that the annual review was to provide Members with an opportunity to pose questions in relation to the information submitted and request additional information; discuss the effectiveness of the incentives provided in promoting and encouraging technology transfer to least developed country Members in order to enable them to create a sound and viable technological base; and consider any points relating to the operation of the reporting procedure established by the Decision.
40.   Some of the information by developed country Members had been received only very recently, and most of it is, so far, available only in its original language. Members would have an opportunity to make further comments at the next meeting of the Council. This would allow Members to study the information recently circulated and any additional information subsequently received. For the same reasons, the Article 66.2 Workshop that would had been held before that meeting had been postponed. The plan was to convene the Workshop on 11-12 February 2019, backto-back with the Council's next meeting in February 2019.
41.   The Chair informed Members that, the day before, there had been an informal small group meeting and ideas had been exchanged with regard to the organization of the forthcoming Article 66.2 Workshop.
42.   The representatives of the European Union; Canada; Japan; Australia; the United States of America; Norway; the Central African Republic, on behalf of the LDC Group; and Cambodia took the floor.
43.   The Council took note of the statements made and agreed to revert to the matter at its next meeting.
IP/C/M/90, IP/C/M/90/Add.1