Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Xolelwa Mlumbi-Peter (South Africa)
8 NON-VIOLATION AND SITUATION COMPLAINTS

299.   Argentina's position on this issue is well-known and, to date, remains unchanged. We believe that complaints of this type are not applicable to the TRIPS Agreement for the reasons explained in document IP/C/W/385/Rev.1, which Argentina co-sponsored together with a large number of other Members. 300.   Non-violation and situation complaints in the TRIPS context are unnecessary. They raise serious systemic concerns, run counter to the longterm interests of the multilateral trading system and upset the delicate balance of rights and obligations in the Agreement. 301.   We believe it is necessary to continue to explore this matter, and Argentina is ready to pursue constructive discussions on this issue with a view to finding an acceptable and permanent solution.

The Council so took note of the statements made and agreed to revert to the matter at its next meeting.
40. The Chair recalled the General Council decision of 10 December 2019, in which Members had decided to extend the Moratorium on TRIPS non-violation and situation complaints until the 12th Ministerial Conference (MC12). In line with the original mandate, that decision had instructed the TRIPS Council to "continue its examination of the scope and modalities" for such complaints "and make recommendations to the 12th Ministerial Conference."
41. In December 2019, many delegations had emphasized the need for a more detailed discussion on TRIPS non-violation, so that Ministers could take a wellinformed decision on scope and modalities at MC12. Most delegations had also said that they were open to engage constructively and discuss concrete proposals for scope and modalities.
42. There had also been a suggestion that one Member might be developing a submission. She encouraged delegations to table submissions that might assist to shape the discussion resulting in a meaningful outcome at MC12. Also, the LDC Group had suggested that the Chair should hold dedicated informal discussions on this issue to facilitate engagement.
43. Since the July 2020 meeting, the Secretariat had also held a Briefing Session on TRIPS nonviolation and situation complaints. She invited the Secretariat to brief Members.
44. The representative of the Secretariat took the floor.
45. The Chair invited delegations to share their views on how the Council should approach TRIPS non-violation discussions between now and MC12, specifically where delegations thought there were areas of commonality, as the discussion had been evolving for some time, and areas that required further clarifications among Members so as to have focussed discussions.
46. The representatives of Brazil; Tanzania, on behalf of the African Group; South Africa; Bangladesh; Egypt; Nigeria; Chile; India; Jamaica, on behalf of the ACP Group; Argentina; Thailand; China; Indonesia; Switzerland; the United States of America; the European Union; Canada; Chinese Taipei; South Africa; Ecuador; and the Republic of Korea took the floor.
47. The Chair noted that she would send a communication with a view to facilitate informal consultations with Members.
48. The Council so took note of the statements made and agreed to revert to the matter at its next meeting.
IP/C/M/96, IP/C/M/96/Add.1