106. Peru's position on agenda items 4, 5 and 6 has not changed. We would like to stress, however, that while there are still no substantive discussions in this Council, countries such as Peru continue to experience misappropriation of our genetic resources and traditional knowledge.
107. According to the National Commission for the Protection of Access to Peruvian Biological Biodiversity and to the Collective Knowledge of Indigenous Peoples, 285 cases of biopiracy related to 42 genetic resources of Peruvian origin have been identified to date. This represents an increase of almost 40 cases since our last meeting in this Council in October. Moreover, 2022 saw the second highest number of biopiracy cases since this Council began its work, reflecting the importance, timeliness and urgency of addressing this issue.
108. The solution that we have consistently proposed, and believe could address this international issue, is the inclusion of an obligation to disclose the origin of resources. Article 29 of the TRIPS Agreement does not suffice, as it does not require patent applicants to disclose the country of origin or provide evidence of compliance with prior informed consent and benefit-sharing. We are aware of the diverging positions, which is precisely why we believe it is necessary to reinitiate the dialogue and discussions that will enable us to make progress on this matter. We thus reiterate our support for the participation of the CBD Secretariat, so that it can shed more light on the issue and on how both instruments can support and reinforce each other. We also think that it would be worthwhile to update the Secretariat's notes.
109. Lastly, regarding the position of some Members that WIPO is the best forum for addressing these issues, we believe that those discussions do not preclude discussions from being held in this House, from our own perspective, and see them as complementary.