Minutes - TRIPS Council - View details of the intervention/statement

H.E. Ambassador Dr Pimchanok PITFIELD
1 NOTIFICATIONS UNDER PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT NOTIFICATIONS UNDER ARTICLE 63.2 OF THE TRIPS AGREEMENT (LAWS AND REGULATIONS)

18.  Ukraine is pleased to inform the TRIPS Council that despite the ongoing Russia's war of aggression and intensive missile and drone attacks we continue to improve our IP system and to fulfil our international obligations undertaken in the framework of the WTO. 19.  In particular, to comply with the transparency principle we have notified the TRIPS Council on recent amendments to our main dedicated IP legislation by two submissions. 20.  The first notification (IP/N/1/UKR/16) concerns the Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" that was adopted with the aim of regulating relations in the field of acquisition, exercise and protection of copyright and related rights, as well as sui generis rights. It has replaced the text of the previously notified Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights". The new Law had been developed in the context of Ukraine's commitments on implementation of appropriate Directives of the European Union, in line with the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement. 21.  The main novels of this Law include as following: a. the range of definitions of basic terms has been revised, introducing new essential descriptions for works and specific kinds of works, performances, phonograms, videograms and sui generis objects as well as updating the definitions of types of use and other attributable elements; b. distinctive legal status of copyright and related rights owners has been introduced in order to provide eligible differences from licensees of material rights; c. legal treatment for unalienable rights to equitable remuneration for authors, performers, phonogram and videogram producers has been introduced into the Law with detailed provisions for certain terms of use of these objects; d. means of free legitimate use of copyright and related rights objects have been extended and supplemented for specific cases; e. the term of copyright protection has been extended to 70 years after author's life as a basic principle; f. the method of compensation instead of claiming damages or losses has been introduced. 22.  Let's now proceed with another notification (IP/N/1/UKR/17) submitted by Ukraine. It presents the Law of Ukraine amending certain legal acts in the field of plant variety rights protection to harmonize them with the provisions of the EU legislation as well. 23.  The purpose of this Law is to optimize legal regulation in the field of obtaining and use of rights to plant varieties in accordance with the best international rules and practices. 24.  The Law improves appropriate terminology, streamlines functions and powers of the competent authority, contains updated provisions on the rights to variety, including intellectual property rights, confirmed by the patent on the plant variety, and property right to spread the variety, certified by state registration. It also clarifies conditions and procedure of their acquisition. 25.  The Law intends to improve the procedure of state registration and to simplify application process by implementing the possibility of obtaining electronic services for filing applications and cutting bureaucratic red tapes. 26.  It also sets new terms of intellectual property rights validity: thirty years - for varieties of tree and shrub crops and grapes, and twenty-five years - for all other varieties, started on the day following the date of state registration of the right. 27.  We expect that implementation of provisions of this Law will promote use and commercialization of new plant varieties and improve access to modern and effective seeds and planting material for agricultural producers, create state-of-the-art regulation in this field, bringing Ukrainian legislation closer to the EU legislation. Both laws have already entered into force. 28.  With this in mind, let us reassure WTO Members that we will continue to comply with our notification obligations and to inform about development of our IP legislation while considering such work as of high priority and great importance, including for rebuilding and recovery of Ukraine.

The Council took note of the notifications and the statements made.
1. The Chair invited the Secretariat to update delegations on the notifications under various provisions of the TRIPS Agreement that had been submitted since the meeting in October 2022 and said she would then offer the floor to delegations wishing to introduce their notifications.
2. A representative of the Secretariat said that the Council had received the following notifications, under Article 63.2 of the TRIPS Agreement:
a. A number of the member States of the European Union had notified a significant number of primary and secondary domestic laws relating to the substance and the administration of their respective IP systems. These EU member States were:
i. Ireland, which had notified a significant number of laws and regulations relating to the substance and the administration of its IP system;
ii. Portugal, which had notified laws on the collective management of copyright and related rights, on copyright exceptions for the benefit of blind people, on the monitoring, control and removal of protected content in a digital environment, and on formality requirements relating to applications for industrial property grants;
iii. Slovenia, which had notified consolidated versions of its Copyright and related Rights Act and of its Act regulating Collective Management of these Rights; and
iv. the Czech Republic, which had notified an amended Act on Geographical Indications, and an amendment to its Copyright Act.
b. Ukraine had notified an amended Copyright Act, and an Act to harmonize legislation in the area of Plant Varieties and Seed Production with EU legislation.
c. The Republic of Moldova had notified a law on Copyright and Related Rights updating and modernizing its copyright legislation and implementing a number of international treaties.
d. Montenegro had notified amendments to its Law on Trademarks.
e. Korea had notified a number of amendments and consolidated versions including its Patent Act, its Trademark Act, its Design Protection Act, its Utility Model Act and its Copyright Act, as well as related Enforcement Decrees.
f. Costa Rica had notified a number of laws and regulations relating inter alia to Copyright and related rights, on Patents, on Trademarks, on Protection of Topographies for Integrated Circuits, and on IP Enforcement, as well as the creation of an interinstitutional commission for IP protection.
g. Japan had notified consolidated versions of the Patent Act, its Trademark Act, and the Designs Act.
h. Hong Kong, China had notified its Copyright Amendment Ordinance which covers a number of areas, mainly to strengthen copyright protection in the digital environment.
3. Montenegro and Türkiye had notified a contact point for IP enforcement under Article 69.
4. The Chair invited delegations that had provided new or revised notifications to the Council to introduce those notifications. The representatives of the European Union; Japan; Ukraine; Moldova, Republic of; Costa Rica; Hong Kong, China; Korea, Republic of; the Russian Federation and the United States of America took the floor.
5. The Chair thanked delegations for the information provided on their notifications and welcomed the information provided by the Secretariat. She noted that Article 63.2 of the TRIPS Agreement was not a one-off requirement, but a core element of the TRIPS transparency arrangements and a central part of the Council's substantive work. It obliged Members to notify any new or amended laws in the area of TRIPS. She urged Members to complete any outstanding initial notifications and to keep up to date with notifications on subsequent amendments. The same applied to the Checklist of Issues on Enforcement which was established by the Council as an element of Members' notification obligations.
6. The Chair also noted that the Article 63.2 obligation included the notification of legislative changes made to implement the special compulsory licensing system to export medicines covered by Article 31bis of the TRIPS Agreement. A more comprehensive picture of how the special compulsory licensing system had been implemented in Members' domestic law could also help Members' on-going discussions about how this particular TRIPS flexibility worked in practice, and about the causes of any potential delays or hindrances in using the system. Notifying these laws would also help the Secretariat in its efforts to provide informed technical support to Members in this area.
7. The Chair recalled that all these notifications could be made through the e-TRIPS Submission System. E-TRIPS not only facilitated the submission of information by Members – it also permitted digital access, consultation, and analysis of this information through the e-TRIPS Gateway, an easytouse interface to search and display information related to the TRIPS Council. The Secretariat was available to respond to any question in that regard.
8. The Council took note of the notifications and the statements made.
IP/C/M/108, IP/C/M/108/Add.1