Actas - Consejo de los ADPIC - Ver detalles de la intervención/declaración

Ambassador Eduardo Pérez Motta (Mexico)
B.i.b Chinese Taipei
64. The Chairman recalled that, at its meeting in March 2002, the Council had decided to review the legislation of Chinese Taipei at the present meeting. The Secretariat had received a notification of the TRIPS implementing laws and regulations from Chinese Taipei, as well as its responses to the Checklist of Issues on Enforcement. He said that the notification of Chinese Taipei had been circulated in document IP/N/1/TPKM/1 and the texts of its main laws and regulations in the related laws series documents. The responses to the Checklist on Issues of Enforcement were available in document IP/N/6/TPKM/1. Chinese Taipei had received questions from Australia, Canada, the European Communities and their member States, Japan, Korea, the United States and Switzerland (documents IP/C/W/364, 366, 367, 362, 380, 379 and 372, respectively ). The responses to Japan had been circulated in advance of the meeting in document IP/C/W/373. The Secretariat had recently received copies of the responses to Australia, Canada, the European Communities and their member States, Korea, the United States and Switzerland (subsequently circulated in document IP/C/W/373/Add.1). In addition, Japan had just submitted additional and follow-up questions (subsequently circulated in document IP/C/W/362/Add.1).
IP/C/M/37/Add.1