Actas - Consejo de los ADPIC - Ver detalles de la intervención/declaración

Ambassador Vanu Gopala Menon (Singapore)
B.i Follow-up to the reviews initiated since April 2001
14. The Chairman turned to the remaining 15 Members whose reviews had been initiated since April 2001 but which remained on the Council's agenda, namely Congo, Cuba, Egypt, Fiji, Grenada, Mauritius, Moldova, Nigeria, Pakistan, Qatar, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Swaziland, and Zimbabwe. Since the Council's June meeting, Congo had provided responses to a number of outstanding questions, but there were still a few questions pending. A communication had been received from Suriname providing information on the status of the preparation of its new legislation on industrial property, and on copyright and related rights (IP/C/W/283/Add.4). Furthermore, he recalled that, at the Council's meeting in September 2002, Canada, Switzerland and the United States had requested Mauritius to respond to the questions they had posed to it on the basis of the new legislation that was pending at that time, and noted that Mauritius had notified its new industrial property legislation earlier in 2003.
IP/C/M/42