115. The representative of Mexico said that, on the basis of a preliminary consideration of the Secretariat note, her delegation had two observations. First, there was very little experience in the use of Article XXIII:1(b) and (c) under the GATT and the WTO. Second, in the GATS context, the scope of the remedy of non-violation nullification and impairment had been reduced. In view of the possible implications of Article XXIII:1(b) and (c) in the area of the TRIPS Agreement, her delegation considered it necessary for the Council to continue detailed study to define the scope and modalities of the application of these provisions in the sphere of the TRIPS Agreement, bearing in mind the specific characteristics of the provisions of this Agreement. Her delegation was grateful for the contribution made by Egypt and other Members, which she would send to her capital for study. Her capital was also analysing the paper by Canada.
