9. Please explain whether Section 47 of the Japanese Trademark Law precludes a person from obtaining cancellation of a fraudulently obtained registration in relation to the criteria specified in Section 47 more than five years after registration. If it does, please explain how this provision complies with the requirements of Article 2.1 of the TRIPS Agreement, to the extent that it incorporates Article 6bis(3) of the Paris Convention, which precludes WTO Members from placing time limits on requests for cancellation of marks that were registered or used in bad faith.